Title Managing Indigeneity, Cultivating Citizens: Reconciliation Action Plans in Australian Organizations
Dissertation Committee: Bart Bonikowski, Michèle Lamont, Jocelyn Viterna (chair)
Successfully Defended: July 2019
Public Access: Proquest | .pdf (automatic download)

My dissertation explores the practice of national reconciliation—a consensus-oriented process of resolving intergroup conflict that seeks to restore collective trust and redefine the terms of citizenship. Specifically, I examine the case of reconciliation between Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples in Australia. The focus of my dissertation—the “Reconciliation Action Plan” (RAP) program—constitutes one of the most far-ranging and visible initiatives through which reconciliation is carried out in Australia in the present day. This unique and entirely voluntary program has stimulated the development of RAPs in nearly 1,000 government, corporate, and community organizations covering roughly 25% of the national workforce since its founding in 2006. My mixed-methods study of the RAP program involved 70 semi-structured interviews, over 100 contact hours with case study organizations and extensive documentary research during over 15 months of fieldwork in the Sydney area.

At its core, my dissertation is concerned with the widespread failure of liberal democratic citizenship to uphold rights and facilitate social membership for ethno-racial minority groups and Indigenous peoples. On one hand, the wide spectrum of opinions about reconciliation as a failure versus an ongoing national project presents an interesting sociological puzzle: how do some social actors come to partner with the state on conciliatory citizenship project of reconciliation whereas others reject reconciliation as a framework for intergroup relationships between Indigenous and non-Indigenous people? At the same time, my dissertation presents a clear and rigorous analysis of state-driven reconciliation: how does Australian reconciliation ask citizens to conceptualize and practice citizenship and Australian identity? And how does reconciliation imagine, enable and constrain relations between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians.  Above all my dissertation endeavored to lay a strong empirical foundation for debates about the future of Australian reconciliation in the post-Uluru era.

The dissertation introduces citizenship project as a useful concept for understanding and comparing large-scale collaboration between the state, other collective social actors, and individuals to change an existing citizenship regime in accordance with a set of socio-political ideals. I find that the conciliatory norms and narratives of Australia’s reconciliation citizenship project promote the acknowledgement and celebration of Indigenous history, culture and people in public life and emphasize voluntary, private action to ameliorate Indigenous / non-Indigenous socio-economic inequalities. At the same time, I find that Australia’s conciliatory citizenship project obscures the role of political and economic structures in ongoing racialized hierarchies and has constrained structural reform as a strategy for combatting racialized injustice. I further argue that conciliatory norms and priorities of the Australian citizenship project of reconciliation are so thoroughly institutionalized that they will continue to influence Australian conceptualizations of Indigenous / non-Indigenous difference and aspirations for intergroup relations for many years, easily decades, to come.